2026-04-14T15:35:50Zhttps://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request

oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/804612026-01-20T11:18:27Zcom_10324_1156com_10324_931com_10324_894col_10324_1294

Pitteloud, Luca 2025-12-10T16:07:51Z 2025-12-10T16:07:51Z 2015 PITTELOUD, L. (2014). A forma da cama na República de Platão. Archai, n. 14, jan - jun, pp. 51-58 https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/80461 10.14195/1984-249X_14_5 The main thesis I intend to defend here is that, although the Form of the Bed (in the Republic) is mentioned as an intelligible Form, Plato does not intend to include such a Form in his metaphysical hypothesis. Taking into account the context of the argument allows us to understand why the Form of the Bed is needed for the intellegibility of the argumentation of Book X, though, as such, Forms of artifacts should not be assumed as members of the family of Forms. However, I suggest that the criticism of the imitative arts in book X ultimately depends on the existence of the intelligible as such and not of certain specific Forms. por info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional A Forma da Cama na República de Platão info:eu-repo/semantics/article