<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-27T13:00:02Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/80532" metadataPrefix="dim">https://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/80532</identifier><datestamp>2025-12-12T20:00:30Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10324_1188</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_931</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_894</setSpec><setSpec>col_10324_1413</setSpec></header><metadata><dim:dim xmlns:dim="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.dspace.org/xmlns/dspace/dim http://www.dspace.org/schema/dim.xsd">
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" authority="0c1aa938-b11d-489c-b2c4-d33bf4fc52a0" confidence="500" orcid_id="">Hernández-Betancur, Juan-Esteban</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" authority="7549db49-5ab3-4894-b0f5-d3f5f32eb293" confidence="500" orcid_id="">García-Valdecasas, J. Ignacio</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" authority="075c1769-d159-4a2b-9fe3-1b28586e5561" confidence="500" orcid_id="">Montoya-Restrepo, Iván A.</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="contributor" qualifier="author" authority="3214b3f8-cfcd-4886-85e9-04b50730b6e1" confidence="500" orcid_id="">Zuluaga Álvarez, Alejandra María</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="accessioned">2025-12-12T12:22:26Z</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="available">2025-12-12T12:22:26Z</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="date" qualifier="issued">2025</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="citation" lang="es">Innovar, 2025, vol 35, n. 96.</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="issn" lang="es">0121-5051</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="uri">https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/80532</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="doi" lang="es">10.15446/innovar.v35n96.107110</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="publicationfirstpage" lang="es">e107110</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="publicationissue" lang="es">96</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="publicationtitle" lang="es">Innovar</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="publicationvolume" lang="es">35</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="identifier" qualifier="essn" lang="es">2248-6968</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="description" qualifier="abstract" lang="es">Decision problems and their relationship with the moments in time is a theme to be&#xd;
explored in the strategy studies field. In fact, several scholars conceptualize strategy from a&#xd;
decision-making perspective, framing it as a sequence of interconnected decisions that involve&#xd;
the allocation of resources necessary for implementation. One way to understand the timing of&#xd;
strategic decisions is through the lens of deliberate versus emergent strategies. Within this&#xd;
framework, organizational ambidexterity—defined as the dynamic balance between exploration&#xd;
and exploitation processes—has been proposed as a key cognitive dimension influencing&#xd;
managerial decision-making. These processes, grounded in organizational learning theory, are&#xd;
subject to constraints such as temporal myopia, which can hinder the ability to appropriately&#xd;
weigh short-term outcomes against long-term implications. In this context, the present study&#xd;
aims to identify the limitations inherent in exploration and exploitation processes that may&#xd;
influence strategy formulation, as discussed in the existing literature. This objective was&#xd;
pursued through a systematic literature review using the Scopus database. The review focused&#xd;
on scholarly contributions addressing decision-making in relation to exploration and&#xd;
exploitation, and the results were categorized into substantial, applied, and complementary&#xd;
contributions. As a result, this study reveals a set of thematic categories —including resources,&#xd;
term, type of activity, background, structure, knowledge, and strategy— that differentiate&#xd;
exploration from exploitation processes. These categories also help illuminate the limitations&#xd;
of each process and their potential influence on the timing and nature of strategic decisions.</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="format" qualifier="mimetype" lang="es">application/pdf</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="language" qualifier="iso" lang="es">eng</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="rights" qualifier="accessRights" lang="es">info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="subject" qualifier="classification" lang="es">Ambidexterity, decision making, exploitation, exploration, strategy</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="title" lang="es">Limitations in Exploration and Exploitation Processes during the Emergence of Strategic Decision-Making: A Literature Review</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" lang="es">info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="type" qualifier="hasVersion" lang="es">info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</dim:field>
<dim:field mdschema="dc" element="peerreviewed" lang="es">SI</dim:field>
</dim:dim></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>