2024-03-29T12:36:06Zhttps://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/requestoai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/358872021-06-23T10:07:07Zcom_10324_1146com_10324_931com_10324_894col_10324_1262
Franceschini, Fiorenzo
García Lapresta, José Luis
2019
Producción Científica
A general problem, which may concern practical contexts of different nature, is to aggregate multi-experts rankings on a set of alternatives into a single fused ranking. Aggregation should also take into account the experts’ importance, which may not necessarily be the same for all of them. We synthetically define this context as semi-democratic. The main aim of the paper is the analysis of the possible semi-democratic paradigms that can be conceived when the experts’ importance is not the same: (i) the importance is described by means of a weighting vector; (ii) the importance is expressed by a weak order on the set of experts; (iii) the importance is described by a weak order on the set of experts with additional information on the ordinal proximities among them. The three paradigms can be applied in different decision-making situations, where some experts perform multiple assignments. In this paper various situations are discussed and analyzed in detail. A series of examples, in the field of interior design of a new car, will complement the description.
application/pdf
http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/35887
eng
Elsevier
Decision-making in semi-democratic contexts
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
TEXT
UVaDOC. Repositorio Documental de la Universidad de Valladolid
Hispana