<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="static/style.xsl"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-06-09T09:16:18Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/70437" metadataPrefix="etdms">https://uvadoc.uva.es/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:uvadoc.uva.es:10324/70437</identifier><datestamp>2025-02-20T10:21:28Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_10324_1165</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_931</setSpec><setSpec>com_10324_894</setSpec><setSpec>col_10324_1335</setSpec></header><metadata><thesis xmlns="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/ http://www.ndltd.org/standards/metadata/etdms/1.0/etdms.xsd">
<title>Using SPEC CPU2006 to evaluate the sequential and parallel code generated by commercial and open-source compilers</title>
<creator>Aldea López, Sergio</creator>
<creator>Llanos Ferraris, Diego Rafael</creator>
<creator>González Escribano, Arturo</creator>
<subject>Informática</subject>
<description>Producción Científica</description>
<description>The role of the compiler is fundamental to exploit the hardware capabili-&#xd;
ties of a system running a particular application, minimizing the sequential execution&#xd;
time and, in some cases, offering the possibility of parallelizing part of the code&#xd;
automatically. This paper relies on the SPEC CPU2006 v1.1 benchmark suite to eval-&#xd;
uate the performance of the code generated by three widely-used compilers (Intel&#xd;
C++/Fortran Compiler 11.0, Sun Studio 12 and GCC 4.3.2). Performance is measure&#xd;
in terms of base speed for reference problem sizes. Both sequential and automatic&#xd;
parallel performance obtained is analyzed, using different hardware architectures and&#xd;
configurations. The study includes a detailed description of the different problems&#xd;
that arise while compiling SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks with these tools, an informa-&#xd;
tion difficult to obtain elsewhere.&#xd;
Having in mind that performance is a moving target in the field of compilers, our&#xd;
evaluation shows that the sequential code generated by both Sun and Intel compilers&#xd;
for the SPEC CPU2006 integer benchmarks present a similar performance, while the&#xd;
floating-point code generated by Intel compiler is faster than its competitors. With&#xd;
respect to the auto-parallelization options offered by Intel and Sun compilers, our&#xd;
study shows that their benefits only apply to some floating-point benchmarks, with an&#xd;
average speedup of 1.2× with four processors. Meanwhile, the GCC suite evaluated&#xd;
is not capable of compiling the SPEC CPU2006 benchmark with auto-parallelization&#xd;
options enabled.</description>
<date>2024-10-04</date>
<date>2024-10-04</date>
<date>2010</date>
<type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</type>
<identifier>The Journal of Supercomputing, 59(1), January 2012, pages 486-498, ISSN 0920-8542</identifier>
<identifier>0920-8542</identifier>
<identifier>https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/70437</identifier>
<identifier>10.1007/s11227-010-0449-4</identifier>
<identifier>486</identifier>
<identifier>1</identifier>
<identifier>498</identifier>
<identifier>The Journal of Supercomputing</identifier>
<identifier>59</identifier>
<identifier>1573-0484</identifier>
<language>eng</language>
<relation>https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11227-010-0449-4</relation>
<rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights>
<publisher>Springer</publisher>
</thesis></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>