RT info:eu-repo/semantics/article
T1 Decision-making in semi-democratic contexts
A1 Franceschini, Fiorenzo
A1 García Lapresta, José Luis
K1 Técnicas de fusión
K1 Fusion techniques
K1 Escalas cualitativas
K1 Qualitative scales
AB A general problem, which may concern practical contexts of different nature, is to aggregate multi-experts rankings on a set of alternatives into a single fused ranking. Aggregation should also take into account the experts’ importance, which may not necessarily be the same for all of them. We synthetically define this context as semi-democratic. The main aim of the paper is the analysis of the possible semi-democratic paradigms that can be conceived when the experts’ importance is not the same: (i) the importance is described by means of a weighting vector; (ii) the importance is expressed by a weak order on the set of experts; (iii) the importance is described by a weak order on the set of experts with additional information on the ordinal proximities among them. The three paradigms can be applied in different decision-making situations, where some experts perform multiple assignments. In this paper various situations are discussed and analyzed in detail. A series of examples, in the field of interior design of a new car, will complement the description.
PB Elsevier
SN 1566-2535
YR 2019
FD 2019
LK http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/35887
UL http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/35887
LA eng
NO Information Fusion, 2019, Volume 52, Pages 281-289
NO Producción Científica
DS UVaDOC
RD 24-nov-2024