RT info:eu-repo/semantics/article
T1 O princípio do processo equitativo na jurisprudência do TEDH
A1 Sousa Mendes, Paulo Manuel Mello de
A2 Ediciones Universidad de Valladolid
AB The decisions of the ECHR regarding the principle of a fair hearing constitutes an immense acquis. But the particularism, pragmatism and informalism common to the ECHR practice, contrasting with the decisions of national courts, provoke an initial sense of discomfort and even disillusionment in the minds most accustomed to legal science based on principles and norms. Here we are now obliged to reason from the analogies and differences of the particular cases decided by the ECHR. Are we in full transition to a model of case-law? The question does not have a single answer, because it will depend very much on the legal methodology assumptions admitted by each one of us as valid reasons to decide the particular cases. But it is true that a logical-deductive and concetual legal thought, enshrined in the domestic legal instruments of law, is definitely set aside. The case-law of the ECHR obliges legal theorists and practitioners to transcend the comfort zone of national legal systems and fosters the development of a universalizable legal science. At the same time, comparative law ceases to be pure erudition to become a necessary instrument for all legal science.
SN 1132-7170
YR 2019
FD 2019
LK http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/40798
UL http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/40798
LA spa
NO Revista de estudios europeos, 2019, Nº. Extra 1, (Ejemplar dedicado a: Cooperación judicial transfronteriza y garantías procesales). coord. por Coral Arangüena Fanego, Montserrat de Hoyos Sancho, p. 66-78
DS UVaDOC
RD 20-abr-2024