RT info:eu-repo/semantics/article
T1 Multifunctional territorialized agri-food systems, geographical quality marks and agricultural landscapes: The case of vineyards
A1 Martínez Arnáiz, Marta
A1 Baraja Rodríguez, Eugenio
A1 Herrero Luque, Daniel
K1 Agri-food systems
K1 Protected designation of origin
K1 Denominaciones de origen
K1 Certificates of origin
K1 Protected Geographical Indication
K1 Vid - Cultivo
K1 Viticulture
K1 Viticultura
K1 Vineyard
K1 Vid - Cultivo
K1 Wine and wine making
K1 Vinos y vinificación
K1 Agricultural landscape management
K1 Sustainable development
K1 Rural development - Environmental aspects
K1 Desarrollo agrario
K1 Desarrollo sostenible
K1 Agriculture
K1 Agriculture - Economic aspects
K1 Food supply
K1 5102.01 Agricultura
K1 3309.29 Vino
K1 54 Geografía
AB In contrast to the industrial agricultural systems aimed at producing unlabeled origin foods without unique characteristics, Multifunctional and Territorialized Agri-food Systems (MTAS) claim their identity in productions whose singularity comes from specific environmental conditions and distinctive knowhow—factors often linked to tradition. Their systemic complexity goes beyond the agri-food production function (high quality, sustainable, and differentiated by origin) because the territories gain cohesion and viability from the positive effects resulting therefrom: environmental quality—in the context of sustainable agriculture based on practices that respect the environment and the local productive vocation of the territories—, landscape value, greater economic diversification by stimulating integrated production chains, tourism potential, etc. In this context, the MTAS finds in the geographical indication one of the most expressive quality reference formulas for the identification of agri-food products. This paper delves into the regulatory nature of the main territorial indications (PDO, PGI) and explores their configuration and regulatory evolution, particularly focusing on the wine geographical indications—the first and most common ones. The Spanish indications are taken as the object of analysis, whose operational maturity reveals their solidity, but also their inadequacies, with the demand for adjustments for greater flexibility in the regulatory framework that identifies them as collective marks. Along the same lines, emphasis is placed on the recent advance of individualistic PDO figures, which call into question the very collective basis of the territorial trademark. These conceptual adaptations of geographical indications provide future lines of research necessary to interpret the coherence of these figures with the sustainable development of the territories, whose name they adopt to gain distinction and market competition.
PB MDPI
SN 2073-445X
YR 2022
FD 2022
LK https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/62431
UL https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/62431
LA eng
NO Land, 2022, Vol. 11, Nº. 4, 457
NO Producción Científica
DS UVaDOC
RD 17-jul-2024