RT info:eu-repo/semantics/article
T1 Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
A1 Tremblay, Annie
A1 Namjoshi, Jui
A1 Spinelli, Elsa
A1 Broersma, Mirjam
A1 Cho, Taehong
A1 Kim, Sahyang
A1 Martínez García, María Teresa
A1 Connell, Katrina
AB This study investigates whether listeners’ experience with a second language learned later in life affects their use of fundamental frequency (F0) as a cue to word boundaries in the segmentation of an artificial language (AL), particularly when the cues to word boundaries conflict between the first language (L1) and second language (L2). F0 signals phrase-final (and thus word-final) boundaries in French but word-initial boundaries in English. Participants were functionally monolingual French listeners, functionally monolingual English listeners, bilingual L1-English L2-French listeners, and bilingual L1-French L2-English listeners. They completed the AL-segmentation task with F0 signaling word-final boundaries or without prosodic cues to word boundaries (monolingual groups only). After listening to the AL, participants completed a forced-choice word-identification task in which the foils were either non-words or part-words. The results show that the monolingual French listeners, but not the monolingual English listeners, performed better in the presence of F0 cues than in the absence of such cues. Moreover, bilingual status modulated listeners’ use of F0 cues to word-final boundaries, with bilingual French listeners performing less accurately than monolingual French listeners on both word types but with bilingual English listeners performing more accurately than monolingual English listeners on non-words. These findings not only confirm that speech segmentation is modulated by the L1, but also newly demonstrate that listeners’ experience with the L2 (French or English) affects their use of F0 cues in speech segmentation. This suggests that listeners’ use of prosodic cues to word boundaries is adaptive and non-selective, and can change as a function of language experience.
YR 2017
FD 2017
LK https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/70360
UL https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/70360
LA eng
NO PLOS ONE, Julio 2017, Vol. 12, n. 7, p. e0181709
DS UVaDOC
RD 22-nov-2024