RT info:eu-repo/semantics/article
T1 La prueba ilícita: la razón de ser y el derecho de la Unión Europea
A1 Bianchi, Riccardo
A2 Ediciones Universidad de Valladolid
AB Analysis, comparison, and critique are the actions that constitute comparative studies. This work, which focuses on exclusionary rules of evidence, employs legal comparison between the Italian and Spanish systems for three purposes: (a) to understand the rationale behind the exclusion of evidence from proceedings; (b) to apply the conclusions drawn to European law, to determine whether the latter (b.1) requires the exclusion of certain evidence or (b.2) conversely, obliges the national judge to disregard the rule; (c) finally, to use the results of the comparison to assess whether judicial balancing is an appropriate solution, even within the European context.
SN 2530-9854
YR 2025
FD 2025
LK https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/73394
UL https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/73394
LA eng
NO Revista de Estudios Europeos; Núm. 85 (2025) pags. 430-463
DS UVaDOC
RD 31-ene-2025