RT info:eu-repo/semantics/article
T1 Life cycle assessment of swine manure management: A comparison of different management systems with Montecarlo simulation
A1 García Álvaro, Alfonso
A1 Martínez-Hernando, María-Pilar
A1 García-Martínez, María-Jesús
A1 Ruiz Palomar, César
A1 Suárez Rodríguez, María del Carmen
A1 Hermosilla, Daphne
A1 Ortega, Marcelo F.
A1 de Godos Crespo, Ignacio
K1 Biogas
K1 Energy recovery
K1 Life cycle assessment
K1 Montecarlo simulation
K1 Pig farming
K1 Waste management
K1 2401 Biología Animal (Zoología)
AB The agricultural industry deeply impacts in the environment due to methane, an important greenhouse gas (GHG), and ammonia emissions that causes acidification and eutrophication. Recognising the urgency of addressing the environmental impact, this study analyses different manure management strategies coupled with diverse energy sources. The principal analytical tool employed was Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), with a focus on evaluating environmental impacts and discerning the most sustainable approach within this context. In addition, Monte Carlo Analysis (MCA) was applied to explore how emissions may fluctuate in response to variations of manure composition. This research contributes to ongoing efforts to align agricultural practices with sustainability goals and reduce the environmental impact. Five scenarios proposed on the swine manure management, based on biogas and solar energy, demonstrate a substantial positive impact on the climate change category when an anaerobic digestion stage is incorporated into the process. Conversely, the impacts related with ammonia emissions were not significantly reduced with the introduction of renewable technologies in the farming. The MCA revealed a high dependence on the chemical composition of the manure for the impacts climate change and acidification in case of the simplest scenarios studied, without biogas production. The application of a solar energy system improves the energy balance and consequently reduce the overall environmental impact. In this sense, hybrid panels that simultaneously generate thermal and electric energy presented the highest energy recovery but significantly higher impacts on eutrophication, toxicity and resource use, due to the higher complexity of materials of these systems.
PB Elsevier
SN 0959-6526
YR 2025
FD 2025
LK https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/76966
UL https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/76966
LA eng
NO Journal of Cleaner Production, 2025, vol. 512, p. 145368
NO Producción Científica
DS UVaDOC
RD 03-ago-2025