RT dataset
T1 Bilingual acquisition data: Dative Alternation-DA L2 Adult dataset
A1 Fernández Fuertes, Raquel
A1 Sánchez Calderón, Silvia
A2 Fernández FuertesRaquel
K1 Studies on language
K1 Bilingual language acquisition
K1 Linguistic theory
K1 Comparative grammar
K1 Syntactic analysis
K1 5701.03 Bilingüismo
K1 5704 Teoría Lingüística
K1 5705.01 Lingüística Comparada
AB This dataset is the result of the research carried out by Silvia Sánchez Calderón (UNED) and Raquel Fernández Fuertes (UVa) in the frame of the Research Group UVALAL (University of Valladolid Language Acquisition Lab, https://uvalal.uva.es/) whose Principal Investigator is Raquel Fernández Fuertes. In this project, the research is conducted on the second language (L2) acquisition of English Dative Alternation (DA) constructions by adult learners whose first language (L1) is Spanish. The results are compared to a control group of L1 English adults. An Acceptability Judgment Task (AJT) was designed for both groups to address grammaticality, sentence structure and word order of the two English DA structures. The two DA structures under analysis involve, on the one hand, prepositional to-datives that alternate as Double Object Constructions (DOCs) (1) and, on the other hand, prepositional for-datives that alternate as DOCs (2). The main aim of this project is to explore the role played by the L2 English learners' L1 in their sensitivity towards the two syntactic variants, with a particular emphasis on the potential crosslinguistic influence effects (or lack thereof) from Spanish into English and the Universal Grammar (UG) effect on their acquisition.
YR 2025
FD 2025
LK https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/80069
UL https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/80069
LA eng
NO Fernández Fuertes, Raquel; Sánchez Calderón, Silvia; (2022). Bilingual acquisition data: Dative Alternation-DA L2 Adult dataset [Data set].
NO UVALAL
NO 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. Title of dataset 1.2. Author information 1.2.1. PI and co-PI 1.2.2. Lab 1.2.3  People involved in the data collection and the tasks design 1.3. Objectives 1.4. Funding sources 1.5. Citing information 2. ACCESS INFORMATION 2.1. Licenses or restrictions 2.2. Publications 3. METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION 3.1. The participants 3.2. The experimental task: an Acceptability Judgment Task 3.3. Data extraction procedure 3.4. Data classification procedure: variables 4. DATA 4.1. Database 4.2. Last update 5. RELATED DATASETS
DS UVaDOC
RD 25-nov-2025