RT info:eu-repo/semantics/article
T1 Making What Present Again? A Critique of Argumentative Judicial Representation
A1 Bello Hutt, Donald
AB Courts do many good things. Judges carefully consider individual claims and arguments,1 and contrast them against the law in light of evidence. Their decisions are argued for, are public, and can be contested in form and content in different hierarchical stages. Additionally, and among other things, these practices are said to contribute to the will-formation of the public sphere and improve the quality of the legislative process.2
PB Cambridge University Press
SN 0841-8209
YR 2021
FD 2021-06-25
LK https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/83024
UL https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/83024
LA spa
NO Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence , Vol. 34 , no. 2, 259 - 281
NO Producción Científica
DS UVaDOC
RD 24-feb-2026