• español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UVaDOCCommunitiesBy Issue DateAuthorsSubjectsTitles

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Share

    View Item 
    •   UVaDOC Home
    • UVA PUBLICATIONS
    • Revistas de la UVa
    • ES: Revista de filología inglesa
    • ES: Revista de filología inglesa - 2013 - Num. 34
    • View Item
    •   UVaDOC Home
    • UVA PUBLICATIONS
    • Revistas de la UVa
    • ES: Revista de filología inglesa
    • ES: Revista de filología inglesa - 2013 - Num. 34
    • View Item
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano

    Export

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis

    Citas

    Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/31887

    Título
    ‘The cure of the kingdome’: defending female authorship in elizabeth poole’s a vision (1648)
    Autor
    Font Paz, Carme
    Editor
    Ediciones Universidad de ValladolidAutoridad UVA
    Año del Documento
    2013
    Documento Fuente
    ES Review. Spanish Journal of English Studies; No 34 (2013) pags. 179-191
    Abstract
    A Vision: Wherein is Manifested the Disease and Cure of the Kingdome (1648) is Elizabeth Poole’s account of the prophecies she delivered before Cromwell and the Puritan Army’s General Council as they debated the regicide of Charles I at the end of the first English Civil War in 1648-49. In her “message”, Poole invokes the analogy between king and husband to advise the Army officers not to execute the “head” of their “body”; however, she gives this analogy a radical twist when she adds that the Council should divorce the king instead, since he had violated the terms of his “marriage” by behaving abusively and tyrannically. While the circumstances surrounding Poole’s participation in the Whitehall deliberations are unclear, her appearance represents a rare case of a woman's direct involvement in the midseventeenth-century discussions of the scope and legitimacy of government. This article discusses the reception of Elizabeth Poole’s text by her contemporaries, as seen in her own defence of her right to relaying her divinely inspired opinion in print.
    ISSN
    2531-1654
    Version del Editor
    https://revistas.uva.es/index.php/esreview/article/view/2181
    Idioma
    eng
    URI
    http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/31887
    Derechos
    openAccess
    Collections
    • ES: Revista de filología inglesa - 2013 - Num. 34 [18]
    Show full item record
    Files in this item
    Nombre:
    revistas_uva_es__esreview_article_view_2181_1756.pdf
    Tamaño:
    168.4Kb
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Thumbnail
    FilesOpen
    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcept where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.10