• español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Navegar

    Todo o repositórioComunidadesPor data do documentoAutoresAssuntosTítulos

    Minha conta

    Entrar

    Estatística

    Ver as estatísticas de uso

    Compartir

    Ver item 
    •   Página inicial
    • PUBLICAÇÕES UVA
    • Revistas de la UVa
    • Sociología y tecnociencia: Revista digital de sociología del sistema tecnocientífico
    • Sociología y tecnociencia - 2018 - Vol.8 Num. 2
    • Ver item
    •   Página inicial
    • PUBLICAÇÕES UVA
    • Revistas de la UVa
    • Sociología y tecnociencia: Revista digital de sociología del sistema tecnocientífico
    • Sociología y tecnociencia - 2018 - Vol.8 Num. 2
    • Ver item
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano

    Exportar

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis

    Citas

    Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/32485

    Título
    Madness and Text: The Psychiatric Paper as a Business and as a Means of Censorship
    Autor
    Bermejo Barrera, José Carlos
    Editor
    Ediciones Universidad de ValladolidAutoridad UVA
    Año del Documento
    2018
    Documento Fuente
    Sociología y Tecnociencia; Vol. 8 Núm. 2 (2018): Evolución cerebral, salud mental y sociedad pags. 26-40
    Resumo
    The journals are basically the only channel through the scientists can make the result of their research know to their colleagues. Scientific journals select the information they publish and guarantee its quality by means of a double blind procedure of censorship by peers. If on the one hand this procedure seems logical as a method for including a study within a consolidated scientific field it is also true that it can function as a mechanism for censorship. If, furthermore, a scientific field such as pharmacology is intimately linked to the business interest of large companies then the companies and journals not only became providers of guidance, but also censors who conceal part of the truth and obstruct scientific advance to defend the economic interest of their patents.
    Materias (normalizadas)
    Sociología
    ISSN
    1989-8487
    DOI
    10.24197/st.2.2018.26-40
    Version del Editor
    https://revistas.uva.es/index.php/sociotecno/article/view/1959
    Idioma
    eng
    URI
    http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/32485
    Derechos
    openAccess
    Aparece en las colecciones
    • Sociología y tecnociencia - 2018 - Vol.8 Num. 2 [6]
    Mostrar registro completo
    Arquivos deste item
    Nombre:
    revistas_uva_es__sociotecno_article_view_1959_1635.pdf
    Tamaño:
    162.7Kb
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Thumbnail
    Visualizar/Abrir
    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExceto quando indicado o contrário, a licença deste item é descrito como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.10