| dc.contributor.author | Segura Ramos, Bartolomé | |
| dc.contributor.editor | Ediciones Universidad de Valladolid | es |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-24T18:06:36Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-04-24T18:06:36Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1995 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Minerva. Revista de Filología Clásica; Núm. 9 (1995) pags. 153-163 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2530-6480 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/35417 | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper deals with two kinds of lexical recurrence as carelessness (likely because of remains of the early latin syntax) and as stylistic device, attending both to Caesar's and Vergil's texts respectively. | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.language.iso | spa | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.source | Minerva. Revista de Filología Clásica | |
| dc.subject | Filología clásica | |
| dc.title | Repetición léxica como abandono y repetición léxica como recurso estilístico | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://revistas.uva.es/index.php/minerva/article/view/3109 | |
| dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage | 153 | |
| dc.identifier.publicationissue | 9 | |
| dc.identifier.publicationlastpage | 163 | |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | |
| dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International