• español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UVaDOCCommunitiesBy Issue DateAuthorsSubjectsTitles

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Share

    View Item 
    •   UVaDOC Home
    • FINAL DEGREE PROJECTS
    • Trabajos Fin de Grado UVa
    • View Item
    •   UVaDOC Home
    • FINAL DEGREE PROJECTS
    • Trabajos Fin de Grado UVa
    • View Item
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano

    Export

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis

    Citas

    Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/44454

    Título
    Análisis de la dominancia ocular mediante Eye Tracker
    Autor
    Pablos Bravo, María
    Director o Tutor
    Sánchez Pavón, IreneAutoridad UVA
    Editor
    Universidad de Valladolid. Facultad de CienciasAutoridad UVA
    Año del Documento
    2020
    Titulación
    Grado en Óptica y Optometría
    Abstract
    Un incorrecto desarrollo visual puede afectar a los movimientos oculares monitorizados por El Eye Tracker, dispositivo utilizado para observar lasdiferencias entre ojo dominante y no dominante y la diferencia por la dominancia según los diferentes errores refractivos.Mediante el Eye Tracker calibrado para cada sujeto, se han realizado los tests TMT-A y Figuras de Lissajous (para el estudio de movimientos sacádicos yde seguimiento) monocularmente en 17 pacientes, y se han obtenido los parámetros tiempo de resolución, fijaciones, distancia de barrido en pantalla yduración promedio de la fijación. Se utilizó para el análisis estadístico el test Kolmogorov-Smirnov. Se realizó la comparación en los pacientes en función de la dominancia oculomotora, en los que se encuentran diferencias estadísticamente significativas(P˂0,05) mayores teniendo en cuenta el error refractivo. Se ha dado como conclusión que el ojo no dominante motor es más lento sobre todo en hipermétropes respecto emétropes y miopes.
     
    Purpose. Ocular movements can be affected by an incorrect visual development. The child could manifest symptoms or not due to a motor ocular movements disorder and this condition could affect to his academic progress. The alterations of these movements probably decrease the fluency and reading ability so important to the reading comprehension and learning. Eye Tracker has been used as a tool to observe the differences between the dominant and non-dominant eye movements, and the difference in dominance according to the different refractive error, for the posterior oculomotor alterations detection related to these parameters. Material and Methods. Monocular TMT-A (saccadic movements study) and Lissajous Figures tests (follow-up movements study) have been made in 17 patients and the oculomotor dominance and refractive error have been collected. Besides, the resolution time, fixations, the on-screen sweep area and fixation average duration have been obtained by the Eye Tracker Tobii4c (Tobii Tech, Sweden) device measured for each subject. For the statistical analysis, the corresponding test according to the normality (Kolomogorov-Smirnov test) has been used to analyze data registered. Results. The comparison between 17 patients according to the oculomotor dominance has been made, in which statistically significant differences (P˂0,05) have been scarcely found. However, these differences get increased in the dominance comparison according to the refractive error. It can be noticed that in the TMT-A test, the non-dominant eye movements are less active respect the dominant one, and respect the refractive error it can be seen an slowing down hyperopics’ non-dominant eye movement compared with the myopic and emmetropic patients. Conclusions. It can be seen a difference in the oculomotor movements according to the oculomotor dominance which is higher taking account the refractive error. The non-dominant oculomotor eye is slower especially in hyperopic patients respect to emmetropic and myopic ones.
    Palabras Clave
    Eye Tracker
    Dominancia ocular motora
    Movimientos oculares
    Idioma
    spa
    URI
    http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/44454
    Derechos
    openAccess
    Collections
    • Trabajos Fin de Grado UVa [30857]
    Show full item record
    Files in this item
    Nombre:
    TFG-G4708.pdf
    Tamaño:
    865.9Kb
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Thumbnail
    FilesOpen
    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternacionalExcept where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.10