• español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UVaDOCCommunitiesBy Issue DateAuthorsSubjectsTitles

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Share

    View Item 
    •   UVaDOC Home
    • SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Matemática Aplicada
    • DEP51 - Artículos de revista
    • View Item
    •   UVaDOC Home
    • SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Matemática Aplicada
    • DEP51 - Artículos de revista
    • View Item
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano

    Export

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis

    Citas

    Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/62982

    Título
    Comparison of efficiency among different techniques to avoid order reduction with Strang splitting
    Autor
    Cano Urdiales, BegoñaAutoridad UVA Orcid
    Alonso Mallo, IsaíasAutoridad UVA Orcid
    Reguera, Nuria
    Año del Documento
    2021
    Documento Fuente
    Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Enero 2021, vol. 37, n.1, p. 1-941
    Abstract
    In this paper, we offer a comparison in terms of computational efficiency between two techniques to avoid order reduction when using Strang method to integrate nonlinear initial boundary value problems with time-dependent boundary conditions. We see that it is important to consider an exponential method for the integration of the linear nonhomogeneous and stiff part in the technique by Einkemmer et al. so that the latter is comparable in efficiency with that suggested by Alonso et al. Some other advantages of the technique suggested by Alonso et al. are stated in the conclusions.
    ISSN
    0749-159X
    Revisión por pares
    SI
    DOI
    10.1002/num.22556
    Idioma
    eng
    URI
    https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/62982
    Tipo de versión
    info:eu-repo/semantics/draft
    Derechos
    openAccess
    Collections
    • DEP51 - Artículos de revista [145]
    Show full item record
    Files in this item
    Nombre:
    comp11.pdf
    Tamaño:
    313.7Kb
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Thumbnail
    FilesOpen

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.10