Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/65292
Título
Interdevice agreement in the measurement of physiognomy parameters and frame angles to prescribe progressive addition lenses
Autor
Año del Documento
2023
Descripción
Producción Científica
Documento Fuente
Clinical and Experimental Optometry, Enero 2023, vol. 106. p. 69-74.
Abstract
Clinical relevance: Ophthalmic lens adaptation requires accurate measurements of physiognomy
parameters and frame angles, with a great impact on subject vision, especially when personalised
progressive addition lenses are prescribed.
Background: The aim of this study is to describe interdevice agreement between different methods
and traditional methods (frame ruler).
Methods: The agreement of the interpupillary distance, nasopupillary distance and fitting point
height measured with four devices (PD-5, OptiCenter, Visioffice and a frame ruler) and of pantoscopic
and frame wrap angles measured with three devices (OptiCenter, Visioffice and Essilor standard ruler)
was assessed in 21 healthy volunteers, by a Bland-Altman analysis; mean difference and limits of
agreement (LoA) were calculated.
Results: Frame ruler nasopupillary distance measurements showed limited agreement with PD-5
[−0.38 ± 1.03 (LoA −2.40 to 1.64) and 0.44 ± 1.02 (LoA −1.72 to 2.61)] and Visioffice [0.62 ± 1.24 (LoA
−1.81 to 3.05) and −0.16 ± 1.72 (LoA −3.54 to 3.22)] measurements for the right and left eyes,
respectively. Poor agreement was found for interpupillary distances (PD-5 [0.21 ± 1.47 (LoA −2.67
to 3.09)], OptiCenter [−0.05 ± 1.16 (LoA −2.32 to 2.22)] and Visioffice [0.46 ± 1.95 (LoA −3.36 to 4.28)]),
fitting point height (OptiCenter [−1.27 ± 2.56 (LoA −6.27 to 3.75) and −0.92 ± 2.77 (LoA −6.35 to 4.51)]
and Visioffice [−5.88 ± 6.21 (LoA −18.05 to 6.29) and −5.98 ± 6.12 (LoA −17.98 to 6.02)] for the right
and left eyes, respectively) and pantoscopic and frame wrap angles (OptiCenter [−4.13 ± 3.75 (LoA
−11.48 to 3.22) and −1.09 ± 0.60 (LoA −2.27 to 0.09)] and Visioffice [−6.18 ± 3.53 (LoA −13.10 to 0.74)
and −1.93 ± 3.49 (LoA −8.77 to 4.91)], respectively).
Conclusions: These results suggest that measurements of physiognomy and frame angles are not
interchangeable between assessed devices and that these differences could induce lens centration
errors with a large impact on progressive addition lens prescriptions.
Materias (normalizadas)
Optometría
Palabras Clave
Ophthalmic lenses adaptation
Progressive addition lenses
Presbyopia management
ISSN
0816-4622
Revisión por pares
SI
Idioma
spa
Tipo de versión
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Derechos
embargoedAccess
Collections
Files in this item
Nombre:
Tamaño:
666.4Kb
Formato:
Adobe PDF
Descripción:
Artículo principal