Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCaamaño Alegre, María
dc.contributor.authorCaamaño Alegre, María
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-09T13:21:52Z
dc.date.available2024-02-09T13:21:52Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationCaamaño-Alegre, M. (2020). “Challenges to Validity from the Standpoint of Methodological Pluralism: The Case of Survey Research in Economics”. In: Gonzalez, W.J. (eds) Methodological Prospects for Scientific Research. Synthese Library, vol 430. Springer, Cham, pp. 185-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52500-2_10.es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/66099
dc.description.abstractBy focusing on the case of survey research in economics, the paper shows how methodological pluralism emerges as a natural consequence from a very common dynamics of feedback between problems and solutions taking place in scientific practice. This continuous feedback between methodological problems and attempts at solving them, being essentially connected with the pursuit of validity, naturally leads to the pluralistic tendency found in empirical research in economics over the last decades and clearly manifest in the case of survey research. The methodological challenges within the latter mainly come from the pervading presence of framing effects in survey research, which, as argued here, prompts the application of new procedures able to improve the different kinds of validity.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses
dc.title“Challenges to Validity from the Standpoint of Methodological Pluralism: The Case of Survey Research in Economics”es
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52500-2_10es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersiones


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem