• español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Parcourir

    Tout UVaDOCCommunautésPar date de publicationAuteursSujetsTitres

    Mon compte

    Ouvrir une session

    Statistiques

    Statistiques d'usage de visualisation

    Compartir

    Voir le document 
    •   Accueil de UVaDOC
    • PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIQUES
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Economía Aplicada
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista
    • Voir le document
    •   Accueil de UVaDOC
    • PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIQUES
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Economía Aplicada
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista
    • Voir le document
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano

    Exportar

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis

    Citas

    Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/21581

    Título
    Allowing agents to be imprecise: A proposal using multiple linguistic terms
    Autor
    Falco Diaz De Cerio, EdurneAutoridad UVA
    García Lapresta, José LuisAutoridad UVA Orcid
    Roselló, Llorenç
    Año del Documento
    2014
    Editorial
    Elsevier
    Descripción
    Producción Científica
    Documento Fuente
    Information Sciences, 2014, vol. 258, p. 249–265
    Résumé
    In this paper we propose a decision-making procedure where the agents judge the alternatives through linguistic terms such as `very good', `good', `acceptable', etc. If the agents are not con dent about their opinions, they can use a linguistic expression formed by several consecutive linguistic terms. To obtain a ranking on the set of alternatives, the method consists of three di erent stages. The rst stage looks for the alternatives in which the overall opinion is closer to the ideal assessment. The overall opinion is developed by a distance-based process among the individual assessments. The next two stages form a tie-breaking process. Firstly by using a dispersion index based on the Gini coe cient, and secondly by taking into account the number of best-assessments. The main characteristics of the proposed decision-making procedure are analyzed.
    Materias (normalizadas)
    Linguistic assessments
    ISSN
    0020-0255
    Revisión por pares
    SI
    DOI
    10.1016/j.ins.2013.08.028
    Patrocinador
    Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (ECO2009-07332)
    Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (ECO2009-12836)
    Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (ECO2008-03204-E)
    Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (ECO2012-32178)
    Version del Editor
    http://www.sciencedirect.com
    Idioma
    eng
    URI
    http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/21581
    Derechos
    openAccess
    Aparece en las colecciones
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista [181]
    Afficher la notice complète
    Fichier(s) constituant ce document
    Nombre:
    InS-Falco-Lapresta-Rosello-2.pdf
    Tamaño:
    434.9Ko
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Thumbnail
    Voir/Ouvrir
    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.10