• español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UVaDOCCommunitiesBy Issue DateAuthorsSubjectsTitles

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    Share

    View Item 
    •   UVaDOC Home
    • SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Filosofía (Filosofía,Lógica y Filosofía de la Ciencia, Teoría e Historia de la Educación, Filosofía Moral, Estética ...)
    • DEP28 - Artículos de revista
    • View Item
    •   UVaDOC Home
    • SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Filosofía (Filosofía,Lógica y Filosofía de la Ciencia, Teoría e Historia de la Educación, Filosofía Moral, Estética ...)
    • DEP28 - Artículos de revista
    • View Item
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano

    Export

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis

    Citas

    Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/22789

    Título
    Pragmatic Norms in Science. Making Them Explicit
    Autor
    Caamaño Alegre, María de la ConcepciónAutoridad UVA
    Año del Documento
    2013
    Editorial
    Springer
    Documento Fuente
    Synthese, 190, 15, 3227-3246
    Abstract
    The present work constitutes an attempt to make explicit those pragmatic norms successfully operating in empirical science. I will first comment on the initial presuppositions of the discussion, in particular, on those concerning the instrumental character of scientific practice and the nature of scientific goals. Then I will depict the moderately naturalistic frame in which, from this approach, the pragmatic norms make sense. Third, I will focus on the specificity of the pragmatic norms, making special emphasis on what I regard as a key idea underlying them, namely, the view, vigorously advocated by classical pragmatists like C. S. Peirce and G. Vailati, that the best test for objectivity is the test of action. Finally, I am going to put forward a tentative list of pragmatic norms that can be abstracted from a careful observation and analysis of scientific practice as provided by current philosophers of experimentation (A. Franklin and F. Steinle among others). The norms will be divided into four classes corresponding to four aspects of science in which they rule, that is, self-correction, prediction, explanation and both experimentation and computation. In the following account, the formulation of those pragmatic norms successfully governing science will be understood as a contribution that scientifically-oriented pragmatism can make to the normative naturalistic project in epistemology.
    Revisión por pares
    SI
    Patrocinador
    Language and Thought: Context-Dependency (FFI2008-06421- CO2-02/FISO), Cognitive Attitudes and the Justification of Knowledge (FFI2009- 08828/FISO), “La pragmática como dinamizadora del estudio de la flexibilidad semántica: contextos conversacionales y contextos teóricos” (FFI2012-33881)
    Propietario de los Derechos
    Springer
    Idioma
    eng
    URI
    http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/22789
    Derechos
    restrictedAccess
    Collections
    • DEP28 - Artículos de revista [93]
    Show full item record
    Files in this item
    Nombre:
    NormFinal.pdf
    Tamaño:
    204.0Kb
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Thumbnail
    FilesOpen

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.10