Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBaeesa, Saleh S.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Medrano, Belén
dc.contributor.authorNoriega González, David César 
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-14T14:21:31Z
dc.date.available2021-01-14T14:21:31Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationAsian Spine Journal, 2016; vol. 10, n. 6. p. 1100-1105es
dc.identifier.issn1976-7846es
dc.identifier.urihttp://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/44996
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractStudy Design: Retrospective study. Purpose: To analyze outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) stand-alone cages. Overview of Literature: PLIF for degenerative disk disease using stand-alone cages has lost its popularity owing to implant-related complications and pseudoarthrosis. Methods: We analyzed the records of 45 patients (18 women, 27 men), operated between January 1994 and December 1996, with a mean follow-up of 18 years 3 months (20 years 3 months–22 years 3 months). Clinical outcomes were measured using visual analogue score (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Odom’s criteria, and radiological measurements of fusion rate, Cobb angle, and implant-related complications conducted at the preoperative evaluation, hospital discharge, 12-month follow-up, and final follow-up. Results: Preoperative mean VAS (back) was 6.9 and VAS (radicular) was 7.2, with mean improvements (p<0.05) of 2.9 and 3.1, respectively, at the final follow-up. Median preoperative ODI was 64.5, with a mean improvement to 34 and 42 at the 12-month and final follow-ups, respectively (p<0.05). Odom’s criteria at the 12-month follow-up were excellent in 11.2% patients, good in 57.7%, fair in 31.1%, and poor in none of the patients; at the final follow-up, no patient was classified as excellent, 71.1% as good, 22.2% as fair, and 6.7% as poor (p<0.05). Pseudoarthrosis was observed in five patients (11.1%), of whom, three (6.6%) required re-operation. Preoperative disk height was 9.23 mm, which increased to 13.33 mm in the immediate postoperative evaluation and was maintained at 10.0 mm at the final follow-up (p<0.05). The preoperative mean L1–S1 Cobb angle was 34.7°, which changed to 44.7° in the immediate postoperative evaluation and dropped to 39.7° at the final follow-up (p<0.005). Conclusions: PLIF stand-alone cages were associated with good clinical outcomes. Although the fusion rate was excellent, maintenance of disk heights and a lordotic alignment were not achieved in the long term.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherKorean Society of Spine Surgeryes
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/*
dc.subject.classificationSpinal fusiones
dc.subject.classificationFusión espinales
dc.subject.classificationDegenerative disk diseasees
dc.subject.classificationEnfermedad degenerativa de discoes
dc.titleLong-term outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion using stand-alone ray threaded cage for degenerative disk disease: A 20-year follow-upes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder© 2016 Korean Society of Spine Surgeryes
dc.identifier.doi10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1100es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.asianspinejournal.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.4184/asj.2016.10.6.1100es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem