Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorLorenzo Martín, Elvira
dc.contributor.authorGallego Muñoz, Patricia 
dc.contributor.authorIbares Frías, Lucía
dc.contributor.authorMarcos, Susana
dc.contributor.authorPérez Merino, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorFernández Martínez, Itziar 
dc.contributor.authorKochevar, Irene E.
dc.contributor.authorMartínez García, María del Carmen 
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-21T13:23:07Z
dc.date.available2021-01-21T13:23:07Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 2018, vol. 59. p. 4821-4830es
dc.identifier.issn1552-5783es
dc.identifier.urihttp://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/45095
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To study corneal wound healing after two cross-linking techniques using either rose bengal and green light (RGX) or the conventional treatment using riboflavin and UVA radiation (UVX). Methods: Corneas of New Zealand rabbits were monolaterally treated with UVX (21 eyes) or RGX (25 eyes). Treatments involved corneal de-epithelialization (8-mm diameter), soaking with photosensitizer (0.1% riboflavin in 20% dextran for 30 minutes for UVX; 0.1% rose bengal for 2 minutes for RGX), and light irradiation (370 nm, 3 mW/cm2, 30 minutes for UVX; 532 nm, 0.25 W/cm2, 7 minutes for RGX). Contralateral eyes were used as controls. Clinical follow-up included fluorescein staining, haze measurement, and pachymetry. Healing events analyzed after euthanasia at 2, 30, and 60 days included cell death (TUNEL assay), cell proliferation (BrdU [bromodeoxyuridine] immunofluorescence), and differentiation to myofibroblasts (α-SMA [alpha smooth muscle actin] immunohistochemistry). Results: Re-epithelialization and pachymetries were similar after RGX and UVX. The haze from day 1 to 15 was greater after UVX. Cell death was deeper after UVX, being localized in the anterior and middle stroma, and was superficial (anterior third) after RGX. Cell proliferation appeared after 2 days and was localized in the middle and posterior stroma in the UVX group but was superficial in the RGX group. After 60 days the number of stromal cells had not returned to the control number in either group. Conclusions: The deeper and longer-lasting cell damage caused by UVX compared to RGX may underlie the slower cell repopulation after UVX and other differences in healing. Shallower damage and a shorter treatment time suggest that RGX may be appropriate for stiffening thin corneas.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherAssociation for Research in Vision and Ophthalmologyes
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subject.classificationWound repaires
dc.subject.classificationCicatrizaciónes
dc.subject.classificationCross-linking techniquees
dc.subject.classificationTécnica de cross-linkinges
dc.subject.classificationRose bengales
dc.subject.classificationRosa de Bengalaes
dc.subject.classificationUltraviolet radiationes
dc.subject.classificationRadiación ultravioletaes
dc.subject.classificationCorneaes
dc.subject.classificationCórneaes
dc.titleRose bengal and green light versus riboflavin–UVA cross-linking: Corneal wound repair responsees
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder© 2018 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmologyes
dc.identifier.doi10.1167/iovs.18-24881es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2705917es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.description.projectConsejo Europeo de Investigación (grant ERC-2011-AdC-294099)es
dc.description.projectGobierno de España (grants FIS2011-25637-R, FIS2014- 56643-R and FIS2017-84753-R)es
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.subject.unesco2209.15 Optometríaes


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem