Network Function Virtualization (NFV) is a promising networking paradigm that will ease the network manageability and increase its flexibility, while reducing costs. In this paradigm, operators must solve the Virtual Network Function (VNF) placement and chaining problems. It is also important to provide backup resources to ensure the survivability of the offered services when a node failure happens. In this paper, we compare two different protection approaches to ensure the service resilience: individual VNF protection and end-to-end protection. Results show the benefits in terms of use of computing resources and energy consumption of protecting each VNF individually, compared to the end-to-end protection approach.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional