Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMolina Martín, Ainhoa
dc.contributor.authorPiñero, David P.
dc.contributor.authorCoco Martín, María Begoña
dc.contributor.authorLeal Vega, Luis
dc.contributor.authorFez, Dolores de
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-20T10:59:08Z
dc.date.available2023-04-20T10:59:08Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationTechnologies, 2021, vol. 9, n. 3, 68es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/59237
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractThe easy access to electronic devices for users has resulted in the development of a vast range of programs and applications for visual evaluation and diagnosis that can be downloaded to any device. Some of them are based on tasks and stimuli that depend on luminance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate differences in luminance reproduction between electronic devices and their implications for contrast reproduction. A total of 20 Galaxy Tab A devices with 8-bit graphics processing units were evaluated. Characterization of every screen was performed obtaining the response curve for the achromatic stimulus. Mean, maximum and minimum luminance, standard deviation and coefficient of variation were obtained to assess differences between devices. Variation of luminance with increasing digital level was observed in all devices following a gamma distribution. Comparison between devices for mean results showed that some of them differed by as much as 45 cd/m2. The coefficient of variation varied from ~5 to 9%. Mean percentage of differences in luminance between devices reached 30%. In conclusion, differences in luminance reproduction between devices were present, even considering devices from the same manufacturing batch. It cannot be assumed that the characterization of one device can be extrapolated to other devices. Every device used for research purposes should be individually characterized to ensure the correct reproduction. For clinical purposes, limitations should be considered by visual specialists.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectMedicinaes
dc.subjectDiagnósticoes
dc.subjectTecnología médicaes
dc.subject.classificationElectronic devicees
dc.subject.classificationLuminance reproductiones
dc.subject.classificationContrast sensitivityes
dc.subject.classificationDispositivo electronicoes
dc.subject.classificationReproducción de luminanciaes
dc.subject.classificationSensibilidad al contrastees
dc.titleDifferences in contrast reproduction between electronic devices for visual assessment: Clinical implicationses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.rights.holder© 2021 The Authorses
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/technologies9030068es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/9/3/68es
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage68es
dc.identifier.publicationissue3es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleTechnologieses
dc.identifier.publicationvolume9es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.description.projectMinisterio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad - program Ramón y Cajal (RYC-2016-20471)es
dc.description.projectCentro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico Industrial y el Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (IDI-20180123)es
dc.identifier.essn2227-7080es
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones
dc.subject.unesco3314 Tecnología Médicaes


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem