• español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Listar

    Todo UVaDOCComunidadesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresMateriasTítulos

    Mi cuenta

    Acceder

    Estadísticas

    Ver Estadísticas de uso

    Compartir

    Ver ítem 
    •   UVaDOC Principal
    • PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA
    • Institutos de Investigación
    • Instituto Universitario de Oftalmobiología Aplicada (IOBA)
    • IOBA - Artículos de revista
    • Ver ítem
    •   UVaDOC Principal
    • PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA
    • Institutos de Investigación
    • Instituto Universitario de Oftalmobiología Aplicada (IOBA)
    • IOBA - Artículos de revista
    • Ver ítem
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano

    Exportar

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis

    Citas

    Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/64734

    Título
    Comparison of functional limbal epithelial stem cell isolation methods
    Autor
    López Paniagua, MarinaAutoridad UVA Orcid
    Nieto Miguel, TeresaAutoridad UVA Orcid
    De La Mata Sampedro, AnaAutoridad UVA Orcid
    Dziasko, Marc
    Galindo de la Rosa, SaraAutoridad UVA Orcid
    Rey, Esther
    Herreras Cantalapiedra, José MaríaAutoridad UVA Orcid
    Corrales, Rosa María
    Daniels, Julie T
    Calonge, MargaritaAutoridad UVA Orcid
    Año del Documento
    2016
    Editorial
    ELSEVIER
    Descripción
    Producción Científica
    Documento Fuente
    Experimental Eye Research. 2016;146:83-94.
    Resumen
    The transplantation of limbal epithelial stem cells (LESCs) cultured in vitro is a great advance in the treatment of patients suffering from LESC deficiency. However, the optimal technique for LESC isolation from a healthy limbal niche has not yet been established. Our aim was to determine which isolation method renders the highest recovery of functional LESCs from the human limbus. To achieve this purpose, we compared limbal primary cultures (LPCs) obtained from explants and cell suspensions on plastic culture plates. Cell morphology was observed by phase contrast and transmission electron microscopy. LESC, corneal epithelial cell, fibroblast, endothelial cell, melanocyte, and dendritic cell markers were analyzed by real time by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and/or immunofluorescence. In addition, colony forming efficiency (CFE) and the presence of holoclones, meroclones, and paraclones were studied. We observed that LPC cells obtained from both methods had cuboidal morphology, desmosomes, and prominent intermediate filaments. The expression of LESC markers (K14, K15, ABCG2, p63α) was similar or higher in LPCs established through cell suspensions, except the expression of p63α mRNA, and there were no significant differences in the expression of corneal epithelial markers (K3, K12). Endothelial cell (PECAM), melanocyte (MART-1), and dendritic cell (CD11c) proteins were not detected, while fibroblast-protein (S100A4) was detected in all LPCs. The CFE was significantly higher in LPCs from cell suspensions. Cells from confluent LPCs produced by explants generated only paraclones (100%), while the percentage of paraclones from LPCs established through cell suspensions was 90% and the remaining 10% were meroclones. In conclusion, LPCs established from cell suspensions have a cell population richer in functional LESCs than LPCs obtained from explants. These results suggest that in a clinical situation in which it is possible to choose between either of the isolation techniques from the donor limbal tissue, then the cell suspension is probably the best option as long as the cells are expanded following our culture conditions.
    Palabras Clave
    Cell culture; Cell suspensions; Explants; Limbal stem cells; Ocular surface.
    ISSN
    0014-4835
    Revisión por pares
    SI
    DOI
    10.1016/j.exer.2015.12.002
    Patrocinador
    This work was supported by the CIBER-BBN (Network Center in Biomedical Research-Biomaterials, Bioengineering, Nanomedicine), Carlos III National Health Institute, and Regional Center for Regenerative Medicine and Cell Therapy of Castile and Leon. Marina López-Paniagua and Sara Galindo were supported by scholarships co-financed by the Castile and Leon Government and the European-Social-Fund.
    Version del Editor
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0014483515300877?via%3Dihub
    Propietario de los Derechos
    ELSEVIER
    Idioma
    eng
    URI
    https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/64734
    Tipo de versión
    info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
    Derechos
    restrictedAccess
    Aparece en las colecciones
    • IOBA - Artículos de revista [83]
    Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
    Ficheros en el ítem
    Nombre:
    Lopez-Paniagua M. Comparison of LESC isolation methods_Postprint version.pdf
    Tamaño:
    1.880Mb
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Thumbnail
    Visualizar/Abrir

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.10