• español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Parcourir

    Tout UVaDOCCommunautésPar date de publicationAuteursSujetsTitres

    Mon compte

    Ouvrir une session

    Statistiques

    Statistiques d'usage de visualisation

    Compartir

    Voir le document 
    •   Accueil de UVaDOC
    • PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIQUES
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Economía Aplicada
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista
    • Voir le document
    •   Accueil de UVaDOC
    • PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIQUES
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Economía Aplicada
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista
    • Voir le document
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano

    Exportar

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis

    Citas

    Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/65098

    Título
    Commitment vs. noncommitment behaviors in natural resource conflicts: A case study of groundwater resources
    Autor
    Frutos Cachorro, Julia de
    Martín Herrán, GuiomarAutoridad UVA Orcid
    Tidball, Mabel
    Año del Documento
    2024
    Documento Fuente
    Economic Modelling, 132,( 2024), 106652
    Résumé
    We examine the problem of natural resource exploitation when an exceptional extraction of a resource (groundwater) is needed and devoted to a different use than its regular use. The study applies a two-stage Stackelberg game to examine the strategic behavior of players who compete for water. The leader, with varying weights assigned to the different uses and environmental concern, is the manager of the new (nonregular) resource use, who only intervenes in the second stage of the game. The follower is a regular (agricultural) resource user. We examine the crucial resource of groundwater, introducing two types of Stackelberg equilibria (open-loop and feedback) that can arise depending on agents' commitment behavior. We compare the extraction behaviors of the leader and the follower for the two equilibria and the effects on the final state of the resource and agents' profits. Unexpectedly, we demonstrate that situations can occur in which noncommitment strategies could be more favorable than commitment strategies in terms of the final aquifer stock and the regular user's profits. To avoid that noncommitment strategies are implemented in these circumstances, the weights assigned by the leader to the different uses will play an important role.
    ISSN
    0264-9993
    Revisión por pares
    SI
    DOI
    10.1016/j.econmod.2024.106652
    Patrocinador
    Este trabajo ha sido parcialmente financiado por la AEI (Agencia Estatal de Investigación) a través de los proyectos PID2020-112509GB-I00 y TED2021-130390B-I00
    Idioma
    spa
    URI
    https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/65098
    Tipo de versión
    info:eu-repo/semantics/draft
    Derechos
    openAccess
    Aparece en las colecciones
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista [182]
    Afficher la notice complète
    Fichier(s) constituant ce document
    Nombre:
    Stackelbergpaper_Authorversion.pdf
    Tamaño:
    480.9Ko
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Thumbnail
    Voir/Ouvrir

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.10