Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorMoreda, Guillermo P.
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz-García, Miguel A.
dc.contributor.authorAlonso-García, M. Carmen
dc.contributor.authorHernández Callejo, Luis 
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-08T11:25:50Z
dc.date.available2024-10-08T11:25:50Z
dc.date.issued2021-03
dc.identifier.citationAgronomy 2021, 11(3), 593es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/70542
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractSolar photovoltaic (PV) energy is positioned to play a major role in the electricity generation mix of Mediterranean countries. Nonetheless, substantial increase in ground-mounted PV installed capacity could lead to competition with the agricultural use of land. A way to avert the peril is the electricity-food dual use of land or agro-photovoltaics (APV). Here, the profitability of a hypothetical APV system deployed on irrigated arable lands of southwestern Spain is analyzed. The basic generator design, comprised of fixed-tilt opaque monofacial PV modules on a 5 m ground-clearance substructure, featured 555.5 kWp/ha. Two APV shed orientations, due south and due southwest, were compared. Two 4-year annual-crop rotations, cultivated beneath the heightened PV modules and with each rotation spanning 24 ha, were studied. One crop rotation was headed by early potato, while the other was headed by processing tomato. All 9 crops involved fulfilled the two-fold condition of being usually cultivated in the area and compatible with APV shed intermitent shading. Crop revenues under the partial shading of PV modules were derived from official average yields in the area, through the use of two alternative sets of coefficients generated for low and high crop-yield shade-induced penalty. Likewise, two irrigation water sources, surface and underground, were compared. Crop total production costs, PV system investment and operating costs and revenues from the sale of electricity, were calculated. The internal rates of return (IRRs) obtained ranged from a minimum of 3.8% for the combination of southwest orientation, early-potato rotation, groundwater and high shade-induced crop-yield penalty, to a maximum of 5.6% for the combination of south orientation, processing-tomato rotation, surface water and low shade-induced crop-yield penalty.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherMDPIes
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titleTechno-Economic Viability of Agro-Photovoltaic Irrigated Arable Lands in the EU-Med Region: A Case-Study in Southwestern Spaines
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/agronomy11030593es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/3/593es
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage593es
dc.identifier.publicationissue3es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleAgronomyes
dc.identifier.publicationvolume11es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.identifier.essn2073-4395es
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem