• español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Listar

    Todo UVaDOCComunidadesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresMateriasTítulos

    Mi cuenta

    Acceder

    Estadísticas

    Ver Estadísticas de uso

    Compartir

    Ver ítem 
    •   UVaDOC Principal
    • PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA
    • Datos de Investigación
    • Datasets
    • Ver ítem
    •   UVaDOC Principal
    • PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA
    • Datos de Investigación
    • Datasets
    • Ver ítem
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano

    Exportar

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis

    Citas

    Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/78220

    Título
    Agricultural products from algal biomass grown in piggery wastewater: A techno-economic analysis
    Autor
    Rojo De Benito, Elena MaríaAutoridad UVA Orcid
    Molinos Senante, MaríaAutoridad UVA Orcid
    Filipigh, Ángel AlejandroAutoridad UVA
    Lafarga, Tomás
    Acién Fernández, Francisco Gabriel
    Bolado Rodríguez, SilviaAutoridad UVA Orcid
    Editor
    Elsevier
    Año del Documento
    2023
    Resumen
    The intensification of livestock activities lead to an increase in waste generation with high content of nutrients, as is the case of piggery wastewater. However, this type of residue can be used as culture media for algae cultivation in thin-layer cascade photobioreactors to reduce its environment impact and produce a valorizable algal biomass. Biostimulants were produced by enzymatic hydrolysis and ultrasonication of microalgal biomass, using membranes (Scenario 1) or centrifugation (Scenario 2) as harvesting methods. The co-production of biopesticides by solvent extraction was also evaluated using membranes (Scenario 3) or centrifugation (Scenario 4). The four scenarios were analyzed by a technoeconomic assessment estimating the total annualized equivalent cost and the production cost, i.e., the minimum selling price. Centrifugation provided biostimulants approximately 4 times more concentrated than membranes, but with higher expense due to the cost of the centrifuge (contribution of 62.2 % in scenario 2) and the electricity requirements. The biopesticide production resulted the highest contribution to investment cost in scenarios 3 and 4 (34 % and 43 % respectively). The use of membranes was also more advantageous to produce biopesticides, although it was 5 times more diluted than using centrifuge. The biostimulant production cost was 65.5 €/m3 with membranes and 342.6 €/m3 by centrifugation and the biopesticide production cost was 353.7 €/m3 in scenario 3 and 2,122.1 €/m3 in scenario 4. Comparing the treatment of 1 ha of land, the cost of the biostimulant produced in the four scenarios was lower than the commercial one (48.1 %, 22.1 %, 45.1 % and 24.2 % respectively). Finally, using membranes for biomass harvesting allowed economically viable plants with lower capacity and longer distance for biostimulant distribution (up to 300 km) than centrifuge (188 km). The algal biomass valorization for agricultural products production is an environmentally and economically feasible process with the adequate capacity of the plant and distribution distance.
    Palabras Clave
    Biostimulant
    Biopesticide
    Microalgal biomass
    Swine manure
    Techno-economic assessment
    Departamento
    Instituto de Procesos Sostenibles
    Departamento de Ingeniería Química. Universidad de Almeria
    Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Tecnología del Medio Ambiente
    DOI
    10.71569/1q3t-j217
    Patrocinador
    Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
    Consejeria de Educacion Junta de Castilla y Leon
    Patrocinador
    PID2020-113544RB-I00 /AEI/10.13039/501100011033
    PDC2021-121861-C22
    PRE2018-083845
    PRE2021-100176
    UIC 338
    Idioma
    spa
    URI
    https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/78220
    Tipo de versión
    info:eu-repo/semantics/draft
    Derechos
    openAccess
    Es referenciado por
    Science of The Total Environment Volume 887, 20 August 2023, 164159, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164159
    Es parte de
    Science of The Total Environment Volume 887, 20 August 2023, 164159, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164159
    Aparece en las colecciones
    • Datasets [90]
    Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
    Ficheros en el ítem
    Nombre:
    Economic analysis.xlsx
    Tamaño:
    250.0Kb
    Formato:
    Hoja Excel
    Visualizar/Abrir
    Nombre:
    Raw data - STOTEN TEA.xlsx
    Tamaño:
    1.318Mb
    Formato:
    Hoja Excel
    Visualizar/Abrir
    CC0 1.0 UniversalLa licencia del ítem se describe como CC0 1.0 Universal

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.10