| dc.contributor.author | Martínez Cagigal, Víctor | |
| dc.contributor.author | SantaMaría Vazquez, Eduardo | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pérez Velasco, Sergio | |
| dc.contributor.author | Martín Fernández, Ana | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hornero Sánchez, Roberto | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-12-17T08:15:58Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-12-17T08:15:58Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, 2025, vol. 45, n. 4, p. 685-696 | es |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0208-5216 | es |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/80692 | |
| dc.description | Producción Científica | es |
| dc.description.abstract | Code-modulated visual evoked potentials (c-VEP) have demonstrated high performance in non-invasive brain-
computer interfaces (BCIs). Recently, research has begun to consider practical aspects such as visual comfort,
where non-binary sequences and variations in the spatial frequency of stimuli play significant roles. However,
calibration requirements remain underexplored in performance comparisons. This study aims to analyze a multi-
variable tradeoff crucial to the practical application of c-VEP-based BCIs: decoding accuracy, decoding speed, and
calibration time. Visual comfort is retrospectively evaluated using two pre-recorded datasets. Models were trained
with increasing calibration cycles and tested across varying decoding times, depicting learning and decoding
curves. The datasets comprised 32 healthy subjects, and featured different stimulus paradigms: plain non-binary
stimuli and checkerboard-like binary stimuli with spatial frequency variations. Results showed that all conditions
achieved over 97 % grand-averaged accuracy with sufficient calibration. However, a clear tradeoff emerged
between calibration duration and performance. Achieving 95 % average accuracy within a 2 s decoding window
required mean calibration durations of 28.7±19.0 s for binary stimuli, or 148.7±72.3 s for non-binary stimuli.
The binary checkerboard-based condition with a spatial frequency of 1.2 c/º (C016) proved to be particularly
effective, achieving over 95 % accuracy within 2 s decoding window using only 7.3 s of calibration, and reporting
a significant improvement in visual comfort. A minimum calibration time of 1 min was considered essential
to adequately estimate the brain response, critical in template-matching paradigms. In conclusion, achieving
optimal c-VEP performance requires balancing calibration duration, decoding speed and accuracy, and visual
comfort. | es |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | es |
| dc.language.iso | eng | es |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | es |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
| dc.subject.classification | Calibration | es |
| dc.subject.classification | Code-modulated visual evoked potentials (c-VEP) | es |
| dc.subject.classification | Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) | es |
| dc.subject.classification | Neurotechnology | es |
| dc.subject.classification | Electroencephalography (EEG) | es |
| dc.title | Reevaluating performance in c-VEP BCIs: The impact of calibration time | es |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | es |
| dc.rights.holder | © 2025 The Author(s) | es |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.bbe.2025.10.006 | es |
| dc.relation.publisherversion | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0208521625000816 | es |
| dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage | 685 | es |
| dc.identifier.publicationissue | 4 | es |
| dc.identifier.publicationlastpage | 696 | es |
| dc.identifier.publicationtitle | Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering | es |
| dc.identifier.publicationvolume | 45 | es |
| dc.peerreviewed | SI | es |
| dc.description.project | Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación Universidades - MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 (grants TED2021-129915B-I00 and PID2020-115468RB-I00) | es |
| dc.description.project | Junta de Castilla y León en el marco del proyecto de I+D+i y financiado por FEDER (proyecto VA140P24) | es |
| dc.description.project | Under the R+D+i project “EUROAGE+: Red Internacional de Investigación, Innovación y Transferencia de Tecnologías para la Promoción del Envejecimiento Activo” (“Co-operation Programme Interreg Spain-Portugal POCTEP 2021–2027”) funded by “European Commission” and ERDF | es |
| dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional | * |
| dc.type.hasVersion | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es |
| dc.subject.unesco | 3314 Tecnología Médica | es |