Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorCastillo Alvira, Daniel 
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Fernández, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorNakamura, Fabio Yuzo
dc.contributor.authorRamirez-Campillo, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Sánchez, Javier
dc.contributor.authorYanci, Javier
dc.contributor.authorZubillaga, Asier
dc.contributor.authorRaya-González, Javier
dc.contributor.authorCastillo, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorNakamura, Fábio Yuzo
dc.contributor.authorSanchez-Sanchez, Javier
dc.date.accessioned2025-12-18T10:37:28Z
dc.date.available2025-12-18T10:37:28Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research, August 2021, 35, 8, 2287–2293es
dc.identifier.issn1064-8011es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/80779
dc.descriptionProducción Científicaes
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to quantify the acute impact of bout duration and individual interaction space on physical and physiological demands and on physical performance. Ten young male soccer players (age: 14.860.6 years) from the same team playing in the National U-16 Division participated. Physical (total distance [TD]; distance covered at different speeds; and maximum velocity [Velmax]) and physiological (peak [HRpeak] and mean [HRmean] heart rate) parameters were collected for every bout during each small-sided game (SSG) format. Moreover, the effects of SSGs on horizontal jump (HJ) and 30-m sprint performances were evaluated. The SSG formats were composed of 6 players a side (including goalkeepers) and included 4 repetitions of 6 minutes in a space of 100m2 (SSG1) or 200m2 (SSG2) and 6 repetitions of 4 minutes in 100m2 (SSG3) or 200m2 (SSG4). The TD, the distance covered at different speeds, and Velmax were greater (p,0.01, effect size [ES]51.25–5.95, large) in SSG2 and SSG4 than SSG1 and SSG3, respectively. Furthermore, the HRmean and HRpeak were lower (p , 0.05, ES 5 1.53–2.23, large) during SSG3 than other SSGs. In addition, while a significant (p , 0.05, ES 5 0.70–2.04, moderate to large) increase in SPR30 time in SSG1 and SSG3 was observed, HJ performance was not affected (p . 0.05, ES 5 0.03–0.54, trivial to moderate) by any SSG format. These findings suggest increasing pitch size to induce greater physical demands and to use SSGs with smaller pitch size, and independently of the bout duration, to induce neuromuscular fatigue.es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherUniversidad de Valladolid. Facultad de Educación.es
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccesses
dc.subject.classificationfootballes
dc.subject.classificationtraining drillses
dc.subject.classificationneuromuscular performancees
dc.subject.classificationpitch sizees
dc.titleInfluence of Different Small-Sided Game Formats on Physical and Physiological Demands and Physical Performance in Young Soccer Playerses
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees
dc.identifier.doi10.1519/JSC.0000000000003114es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/fulltext/2021/08000/influence_of_different_small_sided_game_formats_on.30.aspxes
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage2287es
dc.identifier.publicationissue8es
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage2293es
dc.identifier.publicationtitleJournal of Strength & Conditioning Researches
dc.identifier.publicationvolume35es
dc.peerreviewedSIes
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée