Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorCastro, Sixto J.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-23T20:17:17Z
dc.date.available2026-02-23T20:17:17Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationJonathan Gilmore and Lydia Goehr (eds.), A Companion to Arthur Danto. Hoboken. NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2022, p. 233-239es
dc.identifier.urihttps://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/83014
dc.description.abstractArthur Danto's theory of art assumes a theological way of thinking about indiscernible realities that has been the subject of theological dispute for almost two millennia. Transfiguration–metamorphosis–necessarily involves a change in appearance or in aesthetic properties. Transubstantiation means an ontological change that excludes a priori any perceptible difference. Danto often insists on this very particular aspect when he explains the relationship between artworks and commonplace objects. It seems that Danto's theory is better understood by reference to transubstantiation than to transfiguration. But his philosophy of art history may justify his use of ‘transfiguration.’es
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sonses
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccesses
dc.titleTransfiguration/transubstantiationes
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookPartes
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/9781119154242es
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/chapter-epub/10.1002/9781119154242.ch26es
dc.identifier.publicationfirstpage233es
dc.identifier.publicationlastpage239es
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/draftes


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée