Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/83014
Título
Transfiguration/transubstantiation
Autor
Año del Documento
2022
Editorial
John Wiley & Sons
Documento Fuente
Jonathan Gilmore and Lydia Goehr (eds.), A Companion to Arthur Danto. Hoboken. NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2022, p. 233-239
Resumen
Arthur Danto's theory of art assumes a theological way of thinking about indiscernible realities that has been the subject of theological dispute for almost two millennia. Transfiguration–metamorphosis–necessarily involves a change in appearance or in aesthetic properties. Transubstantiation means an ontological change that excludes a priori any perceptible difference. Danto often insists on this very particular aspect when he explains the relationship between artworks and commonplace objects. It seems that Danto's theory is better understood by reference to transubstantiation than to transfiguration. But his philosophy of art history may justify his use of ‘transfiguration.’
Version del Editor
Idioma
eng
Tipo de versión
info:eu-repo/semantics/draft
Derechos
restrictedAccess
Aparece en las colecciones
Ficheros en el ítem








