Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCaamaño, Alegre-
dc.identifier.citationPhilosophia Scientiae, vol. 19, n.1, 71-84es
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this work is twofold: to explain some of the limitations affecting traditional approaches to theory success, and to outline a criterion for the comparative evaluation of a theory’s empirical success. Empirical adequacy, predictive power, specification of causal mechanisms, and explanatory unification are here regarded as the main, not mutually exclusive kinds of theory success. From that basis, the traditional quantitative criterion for theory success -mainly revolving around the number of a theory’s true empirical consequences-, is refined by adding some key qualitative requirements specially focused on issues regarding a theory’s scope, predictive power, and possible adhocness. A special emphasis will be placed on the following issues: a) the superiority of prediction over accommodation (Lipton 1991/2004, Foster 2002), b) the resolution of non-refuting anomalies (Laudan 2000, Kuipers 2005), and c) the limited use of ad hoc hypotheses (Thagard 1978, Leplin 1975).es
dc.publisherUniversidad de Nantes (Francia)es
dc.titleTheory Success: Some Evaluative Clueses
dc.rights.holderUniversidad de Nanteses
dc.description.project“La pragmática como dinamizadora del estudio de la flexibilidad semántica: contextos conversacionales y contextos teóricos” (FFI2012-33881)es
Appears in Collections:DEP28 - Artículos de revista

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
phsc_19-1_Caamano_peb.pdf194,61 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

University of Valladolid
Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.5