• español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Navegar

    Todo o repositórioComunidadesPor data do documentoAutoresAssuntosTítulos

    Minha conta

    Entrar

    Estatística

    Ver as estatísticas de uso

    Compartir

    Ver item 
    •   Página inicial
    • PRODUÇÃO CIENTÍFICA
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Economía Aplicada
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista
    • Ver item
    •   Página inicial
    • PRODUÇÃO CIENTÍFICA
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Economía Aplicada
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista
    • Ver item
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano

    Exportar

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis

    Citas

    Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/35887

    Título
    Decision-making in semi-democratic contexts
    Autor
    Franceschini, Fiorenzo
    García Lapresta, José LuisAutoridad UVA Orcid
    Año del Documento
    2019
    Editorial
    Elsevier
    Descripción
    Producción Científica
    Documento Fuente
    Information Fusion, 2019, Volume 52, Pages 281-289
    Resumo
    A general problem, which may concern practical contexts of different nature, is to aggregate multi-experts rankings on a set of alternatives into a single fused ranking. Aggregation should also take into account the experts’ importance, which may not necessarily be the same for all of them. We synthetically define this context as semi-democratic. The main aim of the paper is the analysis of the possible semi-democratic paradigms that can be conceived when the experts’ importance is not the same: (i) the importance is described by means of a weighting vector; (ii) the importance is expressed by a weak order on the set of experts; (iii) the importance is described by a weak order on the set of experts with additional information on the ordinal proximities among them. The three paradigms can be applied in different decision-making situations, where some experts perform multiple assignments. In this paper various situations are discussed and analyzed in detail. A series of examples, in the field of interior design of a new car, will complement the description.
    Palabras Clave
    Técnicas de fusión
    Fusion techniques
    Escalas cualitativas
    Qualitative scales
    ISSN
    1566-2535
    Revisión por pares
    SI
    DOI
    10.1016/j.inffus.2019.04.003
    Patrocinador
    Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (Project ECO2016-77900-P)
    European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
    Version del Editor
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566253519301435
    Idioma
    eng
    URI
    http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/35887
    Derechos
    openAccess
    Aparece en las colecciones
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista [181]
    Mostrar registro completo
    Arquivos deste item
    Nombre:
    PrePrint-Decision-makingIF.pdf
    Tamaño:
    312.9Kb
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Thumbnail
    Visualizar/Abrir
    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExceto quando indicado o contrário, a licença deste item é descrito como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.10