• español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Parcourir

    Tout UVaDOCCommunautésPar date de publicationAuteursSujetsTitres

    Mon compte

    Ouvrir une session

    Statistiques

    Statistiques d'usage de visualisation

    Compartir

    Voir le document 
    •   Accueil de UVaDOC
    • PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIQUES
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Economía Aplicada
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista
    • Voir le document
    •   Accueil de UVaDOC
    • PUBLICATIONS SCIENTIFIQUES
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Economía Aplicada
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista
    • Voir le document
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano

    Exportar

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis

    Citas

    Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/35887

    Título
    Decision-making in semi-democratic contexts
    Autor
    Franceschini, Fiorenzo
    García Lapresta, José LuisAutoridad UVA Orcid
    Año del Documento
    2019
    Editorial
    Elsevier
    Descripción
    Producción Científica
    Documento Fuente
    Information Fusion, 2019, Volume 52, Pages 281-289
    Résumé
    A general problem, which may concern practical contexts of different nature, is to aggregate multi-experts rankings on a set of alternatives into a single fused ranking. Aggregation should also take into account the experts’ importance, which may not necessarily be the same for all of them. We synthetically define this context as semi-democratic. The main aim of the paper is the analysis of the possible semi-democratic paradigms that can be conceived when the experts’ importance is not the same: (i) the importance is described by means of a weighting vector; (ii) the importance is expressed by a weak order on the set of experts; (iii) the importance is described by a weak order on the set of experts with additional information on the ordinal proximities among them. The three paradigms can be applied in different decision-making situations, where some experts perform multiple assignments. In this paper various situations are discussed and analyzed in detail. A series of examples, in the field of interior design of a new car, will complement the description.
    Palabras Clave
    Técnicas de fusión
    Fusion techniques
    Escalas cualitativas
    Qualitative scales
    ISSN
    1566-2535
    Revisión por pares
    SI
    DOI
    10.1016/j.inffus.2019.04.003
    Patrocinador
    Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (Project ECO2016-77900-P)
    European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
    Version del Editor
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566253519301435
    Idioma
    eng
    URI
    http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/35887
    Derechos
    openAccess
    Aparece en las colecciones
    • DEP20 - Artículos de revista [181]
    Afficher la notice complète
    Fichier(s) constituant ce document
    Nombre:
    PrePrint-Decision-makingIF.pdf
    Tamaño:
    312.9Ko
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Thumbnail
    Voir/Ouvrir
    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternationalExcepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.10