• español
  • English
  • français
  • Deutsch
  • português (Brasil)
  • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Listar

    Todo UVaDOCComunidadesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresMateriasTítulos

    Mi cuenta

    Acceder

    Estadísticas

    Ver Estadísticas de uso

    Compartir

    Ver ítem 
    •   UVaDOC Principal
    • PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Filología Inglesa
    • DEP27 - Artículos de revista
    • Ver ítem
    •   UVaDOC Principal
    • PRODUCCIÓN CIENTÍFICA
    • Departamentos
    • Dpto. Filología Inglesa
    • DEP27 - Artículos de revista
    • Ver ítem
    • español
    • English
    • français
    • Deutsch
    • português (Brasil)
    • italiano

    Exportar

    RISMendeleyRefworksZotero
    • edm
    • marc
    • xoai
    • qdc
    • ore
    • ese
    • dim
    • uketd_dc
    • oai_dc
    • etdms
    • rdf
    • mods
    • mets
    • didl
    • premis

    Citas

    Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/70308

    Título
    That-variation in German and Spanish L2 English.
    Autor
    Wulff, Stefanie
    Lester, Nicholas
    Martínez García, María TeresaAutoridad UVA Orcid
    Año del Documento
    2014
    Documento Fuente
    Language and Cognition, Marzo 2014, vol. 6, n. 2, p. 271‐299
    Resumen
    In certain English finite complement clauses, inclusion of the complementizer that is optional. Previous research has identified various factors that influence when native speakers tend to produce or omit the complementizer, including syntactic weight, clause juncture constraints, and predicate frequency. The present study addresses the question to what extent German and Spanish learners of English as a second language (L2) produce and omit the complementizer under similar conditions. 3,622 instances of English adjectival, object, and subject complement constructions were retrieved from the International Corpus of English and the German and Spanish components of the International Corpus of Learner English. A logistic regression model suggests that L2 learners’ and natives’ production is largely governed by the same factors. However, in comparison with native speakers, L2 learners display a lower rate of complementizer omission. They are more impacted by processing-related factors such as complexity and clause juncture, and less sensitive to verb-construction cue validity.
    Revisión por pares
    SI
    DOI
    10.1017/langcog.2014.5
    Propietario de los Derechos
    Cambridge University Press
    Idioma
    eng
    URI
    https://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/70308
    Tipo de versión
    info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion
    Derechos
    restrictedAccess
    Aparece en las colecciones
    • DEP27 - Artículos de revista [77]
    Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
    Ficheros en el ítem
    Nombre:
    06 Manuscript [12-24-2012]_Maite_Steffi.pdf
    Tamaño:
    534.7Kb
    Formato:
    Adobe PDF
    Descripción:
    Versión final con solicitud de últimos cambios
    Thumbnail
    Visualizar/Abrir

    Universidad de Valladolid

    Powered by MIT's. DSpace software, Version 5.10